This blog started out as a forum where I would share the lessons I was learning throughout my time getting my MBA in Spain. I’ve decided that’s slightly condescending and probably didactic so now it’s going to be a space where I write my observations and stories of the day as I live this life of f*ck yes!
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Monday, June 21, 2010
Casa del Libro: There's No Place Like Home
If I were the new key player CEO at Planeta, I would stick to the old UNIX platform for Casa del Libro.
2. My Criteria:
In many ways, Casa del Libro was way ahead of the game when they started selling books online in 1995. It was a “very artisan website, not integrated with the back office, running in an IBM AS/400 platform. Everyday operations implied a great deal of manual processing.” For anyone who has been to a Casa del Libro store, this original system actually matches the image I have of them in my mind. When Planeta decided they needed to bring Casa del Libro into the “future” they worked with AOL and a consultant group to revamp their online system so it could handle the expected growth. Of course, this meant they were essentially “building up an entire company.” Their new system was “based on Sun machines, it had 4 servers with 2 CPUs each, running in a Solaris (Unix) operating system. The software included a database manager (Oracle 8.i running in cluster), Vignette 5.6 to manage content and support e-commerce, and Excalibur v5.3 as the search engine. The design was also redundant, in order to guarantee high availability. To complete that, a firewall and a load balancer were also included.”
It is evident that Casa del Libro underwent many changes in a short span of time. And what, exactly, were their needs? Not that many, if you think about it. They were just selling books. They weren’t Amazon and I don’t think they even wanted to be (even if AOL probably did). Switching systems would be like building a new company all over again and would cause some commotion internally as well as leading them to stray even farther from their original purpose. Although switching would save them money, part of the cost cutting was as a result of some bad luck with timing and repositioning decisions made on behalf of executives that weren’t necessarily in touch with Casa del Libro or their target market. Once the dotcom world regained its strength and Casa del Libro went back to its roots, their online market would recapture its strength and possibly gain more clients according to its better operating system (as compared to what they had in ’95).
Tesco: Testing IT
Pinkberry: The Movie
Monday, June 14, 2010
ERRRR, ERP?
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) is an Integrated computer-based system used to manage internal and external resources including tangible assets, financial resources, materials, and human resources. It is a software architecture whose purpose is to facilitate the flow of information between all business functions inside the boundaries of the organization and manage the connections to outside stakeholders. Built on a centralized database and normally utilizing a common computing platform, ERP systems consolidate all business operations into a uniform and enterprise wide system environment.
So, knowing this, let’s discuss how I think ERP’s fit into the corporate world and if companies should be adjusting to ERPs or if ERPs should be adjusting to them.
It seems to me that an ERP is like a massive back office. Companies use it for organization and facilitation. Basically, they make your business run better and help connect your business to its target market. Sounds great, right? But, like any office, there is a built in system. Unlike any office, it is computerized (not people run), so the ability for it to adapt and mold in an easy fashion appears to be slightly difficult. I’m basing this on reviews that I’ve read online. Many people seem to find it annoying that the system won’t budge. Let’s use our blackboard suite as an example. Is it an ERP? I have no clue. But it sure does kind of sound like one. Personally, I’m not a huge fan of it. It’s not easy to use or modify to work for you. There is tons of information that is completely irrelevant and unrelated to me and yet it’s my personalized home page. I can’t stand the interface, and logging into it is something I legitimately dread doing. Why? Because I like to keep things simple and it makes things complicated.
So, if an ERP is anything like this then I think that ERP’s should be made to adapt to companies rather than a company adapt to an ERP. Every company is different, with different missions, goals, and systems. Everyone takes a different approach to how they do their work and that doesn’t mean that any one way is better. So why be limited by the system that Microsoft or any other ERP producer deems fit?! Not to mention that success is often hinged on the ability to grow, change, adapt and innovate. A built in system goes against pretty much all of that. Sure, it keeps things organized and clean cut. But, sometimes, running a tight ship is exactly what hinders it from swerving off coarse into the desired triumphant blue ocean.
DELL: TO HELL IN A HANDBASKET?
Thursday, June 10, 2010
Everyone Needs A Leader...
New Lady Gaga: Alejandro!
Monday, June 7, 2010
FB: The Trendy Next Best Bookend?
I’ve been a member of Facebook since August or September of 2004. I will never forget the day the girl with whom I was interning at my first film-related internship introduced me to Facebook. She went to Princeton and, at the time, Facebook was only for students at Princeton, Harvard, Yale, Duke, & maybe even a few other Ivy Leagues. By the end of the summer, my alma mater Johns Hopkins was officially on. I don’t even remember the girl’s name or the names of the people for whom I was interning. Facebook, on the other hand, hasn’t left my thought process since. Even though I have officially deactivated my account 3 times (and clearly I'm not the only one), it was never out of hatred so much as it was out of confusion about where my relationship with FB was going. So, where is it going? Not sure. But, let’s see where we think Facebook itself might be going in the next couple of years…
That said, the extreme openness of the network has proven to be beneficial to mass communication strategies that will likely be cloned in the near future. Just looking at the 2008 Presidential election in the USA serves as proof enough of the power of Facebook to convey information on a grandiose level. As the CNN article specifies, the election was won not only because of face time but also because of the candidates ability to seem engaged with the population and one way in which they did this was through Facebook. This wasn’t the first time Facebook, or any other social network, was used for political or social campaigning. So, while Facebook may not allow individuals to be relevant socially because of the lack of exclusivity, it does become a powerful tool when it comes to power in numbers. If anything, the feeling of connectedness and social acceptance is a very powerful tool which, when implemented correctly, can give one great power and attract support. It’s 2010, so we have another election in the states coming up in 2 years. Perfect timing! I think they will use Facebook again (and any other online social network source) and I think it will be still be effective but it will also be a perfect marker to use when comparing the future with the present.
Sunday, June 6, 2010
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
Monday, May 31, 2010
My Name is Karina, and I'm A Googler
Sunday, May 30, 2010
Animating a Blockbuster: Toy Story 3!
Animating a Blockbuster: How Pixar Built Toy Story 3
Posted using ShareThis
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
WOT'S...UH, THE DEAL [Microsoft]?
It seems to me that one way to analyze where Microsoft is today is by looking at where it isn’t. Microsoft has a bunch of “enemies,” if you will. The 3 major competitors (apart from itself) that first come to mind are Apple, Google and Oracle. From my perspective, it seems that all these companies managed to fulfill a want in the eye of the consumer, and masked it as a need by comparing it to the inefficiencies of Microsoft. Apple offers design innovation and user-friendly technology. During it’s rebirth, it positioned itself as the computer for the digital artist, making itself the go to system for people in advertising, sales, marketing, film, television, art, music etc. With the right, cutting edge, hip and loyal clientele, the image of the company changed. Mac, the iPod and the iPhone are revolutionary not only for the technology they offer and how they serve as a highway of information (because, at the end of the day, that’s what they really are), but also because they allow the consumer to assume an image by simply owning the product. Similarly, Google has positioned itself as this hip, young, encyclopedic appendix that somehow provides products to its users way before we even realized we wanted them. I use google for everything from email, maps, photos (ha, yes, you can’t see my photos on facebook but you can see them on Picasa…why I seem to trust them more is a mystery), rss reader, work groups, and calendar. When google comes up with their 4Square, I will likely actually try it out as well (I switched from AIM to Gchat seamlessly so the argument that people don’t like switching programs is still yet to conclude in my mind). And, finally, Oracle seems to be the way of the future. I don’t know enough about Oracle and the products but I do know that they are a force with which to be reckoned both in software and in their vision for information storage and, maybe more importantly, information sharing and distribution. With regards to Oracle, cloudware appears to be the thing on which to focus (of course, don’t stare too long…haha, get it? Clouds? Sun? Don’t stare? Not funny? OK…). Clearly a useful tool for businesses, if marketed correctly, cloudware will be what allows us to maximize our autonomy and mobility, reducing friction and increasing efficiency. The key here is how it helps laymen like me (and not just big companies). Like Apple and Google, Oracle will have to make this useful for the people in order to make it succeed and, thus far, it looks to be going in that direction.
Of course, this isn’t about the above 3 competitors. But what do they tell us about why can’t Microsoft keep up? Or, are they keeping up and I’m the idiot who just can’t tell? It’s hard to say from my perspective. It seems to me that Microsoft just isn’t as interesting any more. The value they bring to the market is the same as the value they brought before. Unfortunately, other companies have managed to bring more new value in the last few years, pushing Microsoft from the helm of innovation into a world of predictability. There are the key products upon which we still rely (and will continue to rely for a few more years) but the new products and services they offer are never eye-catching (I’ve never once stopped to look at Bing). I wanted to say that Microsoft lacks interesting innovation, but then I saw this TED talk (because I love all the TED talks) and it has definitely shown me that Microsoft is actually very innovative and just really bad at letting people know:
Blaise Aguera y Arcas demos augmented-reality maps | Video on TED.com
Their inability to communicate their interesting and innovative strides in technology, coupled with the security issues encountered by users has led to a loss of trust in the consumer and, therefore, a shift in loyalty from good ol’ Microsoft to any of the above competitors.
Another interesting project Microsoft is taking on is palm reading. I read in Wired Magazine that Microsoft is shifting into the world of predicting the future by monitoring the actions and habits of individuals. Thus far, this doesn’t seem all that unusual (google and amazon are only two examples that successfully target their market by doing the same thing). Instead of using the information to further sales, however, they will use it to predict the future. Exactly what they plan on doing with the predictions seems a bit unclear. Although, the benefit of such information and statistics is, obviously, extremely useful and a very powerful source to control. It will be interesting to see exactly where this new business approach will lead and what it will do to the Microsoft business model. I have a feeling that Microsoft will stick around, just not as we know it today.
So, Wot’s…uh the deal, Microsoft? Pink Floyd asked this pertinent and ever relevant question on their Obscured by Clouds album in 1972 which I, in turn, would like to pose to Gates. There’s a lot of pressure if you’re the “man on the outside looking in” trying to “turn my land into gold” as you are “growing old,” and you “try to keep up with the turning of the wheel. Mile after mile, stone after stone…you’re on your own.” And can Microsoft maintain their position on the outside? Or do they fall in and become the “man on the inside looking out” shouting “what’s the news and where you been?” since “there’s no wind left in [their] soul and [they’ve] grown old?” Well, I’m pretty sure that the song is not about Microsoft. In my opinion, they were their own competitors and isolated themselves in a way in which now it seems the albatross may be on its way and they are doomed to drown their dinosaur ship. There are lifeboats on board, however. So which one will they take? And will it save them? It’ll be interesting to watch….
Saturday, May 15, 2010
What is Foursquare?!
It is no secret that I have a slight dislike for numbers. It may be a dislike based in fear. Or maybe just a dislike built from a relationship with tumultuous history. Or maybe I just love them so much that I hate them because I can’t master something I love that much. Either way, when we were told to look into Foursquare, join it and write about it I had a slight visceral reaction. To be fair, the site never had a chance with me. You put a number in your title and I turn a blind eye. Throw in a mathematical term like “square,” “logarithm” or, I don’t know, “addition,” then you may as well stop wasting your money trying to reach a potential customer like me because you’ve officially been tucked (and chained) away into the Hades of my brain. It’s like when your parents are selectively def to you only I do it with numbers. On top of that, I hate signing up for things online and having yet another account on another website that asks for another log in with another password that has to have another set of random numbers at the end of it and that asks me to type in the stupid random letters in the fishbowl view because, somehow, typing those letters means something. And, hey. Maybe it does. In which case, I welcome enlightenment and will happily include them every time someone tries to read my posts or when my professors need to open my assignments or when anyone opens my emails. Because, if it’s that important, then shouldn’t we all just instigate it?!
(NB – for all non-school readers, the rest of this may prove to be boring…or you may learn something that you feel like posing to your boss as some brilliant outlet for viral marketing or digital distribution or something)
Anyway, I’m digressing. Back to Foursquare. The business model is simple and, thus far, seemingly effective. Launched in 2009, Foursquare claims already to have more than 2 million users. If nothing else, Foursquare is a social networking tool used to disburse and take in information. There are 3 ways to be a Foursquare user: the person posting, the person reading and the company being referenced. As the poster, every time you go to a location and you want your friends to know where you are, you simply mark it on your Foursquare account. On the flipside, if I’m supposed to meet a friend and he says “Starbucks on 82nd Street” but there happen to be 2 Starbucks on 82nd street directly across the street from each other (since one of them is in Barnes and Noble*), then I could log into my Foursquare account and narrow down in which Starbucks he’s waiting. Thankfully, you don’t have to disclose your location to everyone (because, Jose Ramon, like you, I like my privacy too). As is evident by my example, there is the automatic benefit to Starbucks, our 3rd user.
Foursquare makes itself a bit more interesting through this gaming badge thing program that it runs. The way it works is that every time you check in somewhere, you gain points. Eventually, if you check in to a specific type of place enough you will receive a badge. They had a recent issue with their “douchebag badge.” It seems that if you went to Barney’s enough, you ran the risk of getting the douchebag badge. I find this hysterical for two reason: first of all, I actually love Barney’s so it’s funny that I’m on my way to douchebag-dom, and second of all, I love that Foursquare seems to blindly be digging it’s own grave. Or, do they think that all publicity is good publicity? Because, I'm not so sure that I agree. Also, if you check in to the same place more than once, you can be awarded the “mayor” title. Certain restaurants are actually doing mayor specials. Foursquare will even keep tabs on your activities and can draw up stats on your activities and where you check in so you can see your general habits. As of now, apart from being interesting to read about these offers, there is nothing about the badging mayoral system that seems enticing.
The final activity Foursquare offers, and the only one which seems semi-useful to a laymen user, is the navigator type tool that helps you discover the ins and outs of the city which you’re in. If you are on your phone (and that phone happens to have GPS), Foursquare will use the GPS to track where you are and recommend local bars, restaurants, shops around you. It presents you with tips from fellow users about that location. This is where their corporate partnerships mainly come in. They have deals with Zagats, Bravo, Lucky Magazine, and Harvard, to mention a few. Their partnerships allow for greater streaming of information to users and an increase of exposure to clientele for the companies. On top of that, the gps (and even the badging bit) is a passive form of viral advertising, allowing users to think the site is about them even though it’s really about generating profit for the companies. This aspect of the model is definitely worth exploring and dissecting to see how it can be applied in other industries.
Yelp, MyTown, Loopt, and Gowalla, (Google and Facebook are not far behind) all provide similar check-in services. So, who will win? Well, I can’t say but I’m pretty sure it will be whichever site your 14 year old niece/cousin/sister/neighbor and all of her friends prefer. Foursquare has already been referenced on Gossip Girl, giving them a nice step up amongst the tween community on the east coast (GG isn’t so popular out west).
One commendable thing about Foursquare is its success in making itself available to all users, no matter their mac, pc or smart phone preference. Apart from being easy to access by the users (which, interestingly enough, is parallel to their mission for their users to have easy access to each other), the ability to be located on a map visible to your friends, receive badges and become a mayor serve as the 3 major reasons why I wouldn’t join Foursquare. First of all, I don’t want to be found most of the time. Being connected to your network and being able to found by them are very different things. The idea of badges seems dumb to me. Becoming the mayor of a specific location is equally as silly. The main attributes seem to be the user sponsorship of certain locations, the user commentary on those locations and the development of corporate partnerships. The potential of this kind of a site seems to have barely been tapped since, as of now, this online playpen is only populated by the clientele. As soon as the little white rabbit in every company pops up with their clock reminding their corporate headquarters that they’re running quite behind and very late, I’m assuming they will jump in and begin a somewhat ethereal online promoting, cross-marketing, information streaming Wonderland frenzy. I really do envision this like a sandbox in Times Square.
So, am I sold on this site? Honestly, no. Obviously not. Foursquare seems to be scratching the surface of the future. It's a nice tease for what's to come but it seems to be more of an interim-fad geared very well for user #1 & 2 and a good instrument for experimentation for companies trying to figure out how maximize use of the internet and generate profit from it. Although I will not pretend to know what the future will have in stock for us, it won't, in my opinion, be about looking at a screen to see where we are all checking in...since, the screen is kind of what seems to be holding us back a bit.
I must say, however, that I am very happy to have even looked into Foursquare and had the opportunity to decide that it wasn't for me...it's something I would have never done sans Dans (haha, it rhymes...I know, I'm a dork). In the end, however, if it had a little more Ferris Bueller and a little less douchey-ness, I would be more driven to explore the site a bit more. Apart from that, however, I’m pretty happy without Foursquare in my life as I wait for the actual next big thing. It’s shocking, I know.
*By the way, the two Starbucks are actually not across the street from each other. One is on 81st and the other is on 82nd street. But you get the point…
Friday, May 14, 2010
INCEPTION TRAILER
And, who doesn't love a dream plot line? I mean, if it goes well then it's amazing and if it goes poorly then you can always just blame the dream plot to be a challenge and at least they gave it a good shot. Not to mention the effects and the cast. Cillian Murphy is by far one of my favorite actors. I would pretty much go see this movie for him and not for anyone else in it.
Sarah Palin says America is a Christian Nation on Bill O'Reilly
Saturday, May 1, 2010
Jon Stewart (and Aasif), I love you
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-april-22-2010/wham-o-moves-to-america